The Human Cost of Bad Science: Therapists need new tools

(l. to r.) Carrie Lobman, moderator, Gil Eyal, Lois Holzman, Christine LaCerva discuss the Human Cost of Diagnosis

The Human Cost of Diagnosis forum brought together Columbia University’s Gil Eyal, the Institute’s Lois Holzman, and Social Therapy Group director Christine LaCerva at NYU’s Vanderbilt Hall. The audience of 100+ therapists, educators, parents and others were treated to three ways of looking at diagnosis with a critical eye.  A critic of the American Psychiatric Association’s clumsy and (at least in the case of the ‘autism’ label) class-biased taxonomy, Eyal recounted his research into the history, sociology and politics of Autism.  Holzman, who has written extensively as part of the outcry surrounding revisions to the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), pointed to how the diagnostic paradigm distorts our understanding of human beings and limits our capacity to help. LaCerva, who trains clinicians in the non-diagnostic Social Therapy group approach, described how young people and families in her practice develop socially and emotionally by participating (and performing) as members of their social therapy group

We’re looking to create an environment in our groups where people can play with diagnosis, says LaCerva.  [See: The Hamburger Syndrome.]

The discussion with the audience drew out two important themes:  While the formal institutions of psychiatry and psychology appear to have become increasingly authoritarian, practitioners are finding creative ways to help their patients – which often don’t conform to the APA’s strictures. Still, most therapists are poorly prepared to help people – the tools they’ve been given are outmoded, and access to developmental therapies and practices is limited. It’s the human cost of bad science.

Advertisements

About Janet Wootten

Janet Wootten is a media and public relations professional, a member of the Institute’s Board of Directors and a leader of its annual community fundraising campaign.
This entry was posted in Carrie Lobman, Christine LaCerva, Lois Holzman, Psychology, Social Therapy, Training and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Human Cost of Bad Science: Therapists need new tools

  1. DSM-IV/V diagnoses are incomplete categories, but I believe it’s a language system professionals need to communicate across disciplines. As for therapists being poorly trained – like every field, some are, some are not. I believe that the training I received is the foundation for what I try to build on constantly, to become as expert in my field as I possibly can. Not every therapist practices this way. Not every human being lives this way.

  2. janetwootten says:

    Thanks for responding Lynn. Interesting to consider whether we need a language system to help others and/or to get help. Perhaps it’s the case that by being engaged in a therapeutic process where groups CREATE meaning/language (including diagnostic labels), could be what’s curative? Hope you’ll read an interesting post on this very topic: THE HAMBURGER SYNDROME (By Christine La Cerva)…. http://thecommunitytherapist.com/2010/10/26/the-hamburger-syndrome/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s